andrew jakk christian sharp download

[Footnote 31: dicatus: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "dicatis."] (rejecting the word "Dragon") "quod TU MANDARES" (the [Footnote 35: fell: So 4to 1604.--The later 4tos "liue."] [Footnote 42: vestigiis nostris: Old eds. "vestigias nostras."] Note *, from p. 83. (Doctor Faustus, from the quarto of 1604): [Footnote 34: accidens: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "accident."] [Footnote 43: backward: So 4to 1616 (and so 4to 1604).--2tos 1624, 1631, [Footnote 30: Mephistophilis Dragon, quod tumeraris: See note *, p. 83. construction being "quod tu mandares ut Mephistophilis "surgat Mephistophilis DRAGON, quod tumeraris."--There is a appareat et surgat"): but the "tu" does not agree with the 4 deuils, Faustus to them with this speech,"--wrongly.] [Footnote 36: strike: So 4to 1631.--2tos 1616, 1624, "strikes."] [Footnote 40: again: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--Not in 4to 1616.] [Footnote 33: speeches: So 4to 1604.--Not in the later 4tos.] [Footnote 37: thorough: So 4to 1631.--2tos 1616, 1624, "through."] [Footnote 29: erring: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "euening."] TUMERARIS," Mr. J. Crossley, of Manchester, would read [Footnote 28: her: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "his."] preceding "vos."--The Revd. J. Mitford proposes "surgat [Footnote 41: or: Old eds. "for."] corruption here, which seems to defy emendation. For "quod Mephistophilis, per Dragon (or Dagon) quod NUMEN EST AERIS."" ] "surgat Mephistophilis, quod tumeraris: The later 4tos have [Footnote 39: save: So 4tos 1616, 1624.--2to 1631 "spare."] [Footnote 38: Sirrah: So 4to 1616.--Not in 4tos 1624, 1631.] [Footnote 32: came hither: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "came NOW hether."]