amadeusvista download

and controlled the liquor traffic and that license laws declares the position that the license laws are uncon- have existed in Indiana since 1807, beginning with a Indiana has had the question of the constitutionality That not only settles the "freak" decision of Judge of license laws squarely presented to it in the so-called out regard to their fitness, or, in other words, abso- The Rule of "Not Too Much." ing the liquor traffic would, says the court, "operate lutely unrestricted." who desire to engage in the traffic could do so with- 91 that as early as 1535 the English Parliament licensed Sopher case in which Judge Ira Christian of Noble- of the anti-alcoholists that the right to sell liquor stitutional wholly untenable and indefensible. It shows sell liquor without any restriction except such as Since the above was written the supreme court of is not a common law right. The court here ville had followed Judge Artman. The supreme court distinctly recognizes the right of every person to territorial law. The overthrow of the statutes regulat- Artman but also demolishes one of the pet contentions the common law to retail intoxicating liquors, and all To Sell Liquor is a Common Law Right. to restore all persons to their unrestricted rights under may be imposed by law. This reverses the en-