07 Dec




















ter since Dr. Eliot virtually abandoned his contention. Quandoque bonus dorniitat Homerus. good provision of beer and light wine will not pre- nia." The article, however, was too utterly silly to ''Growler" did not let the matter rest with Dr. Eliot's tion. But now the statement is quoted again and is statement. As I do not want to follow the fashion of vent Teutonic people from drinking distilled liquor to It therefore becomes necessary to state that the excess. On this point see the experience of Califor- to say about it is that a little slip is liable to happen was my intention to say nothing more about that mat- merit a reply, and the medium in which it appeared, the anti-alcoholists, of publishing garbled extracts, I A writer in a California paper a short time ago quoted The Rule of "ttot Too Much. 3 ' In your letter of January 8th, you have this passage: "A will here give the correspondence in full. All I have CHICAGO, ILL., FEBRUARY 7th, 1906. CHAS. W. ELIOT, Esq., was not of sufficient consequence to call for refuta- likely to go the rounds of the prohibition press. triumphantly Dr. Eliot's statement that "a cheap and And, now, as to the letter of President Eliot. It to anybody, even to the president of a great university. cheap and good provision of beer and light wine will not 47 President Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Dear Sir:

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.
I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING