07 Dec




















telephone matter, he was mistaken. No subject was ever so thoroughly all forms of existing telegraphs, and that you will be successful in ever been submitted to such determined assault from every direction as the infinitely delicate vibrations made by the human voice. It could his later years, realized that his machine could never be used for the investigated as the invention of the speaking telephone. No patent has Bell's; and no inventor has ever been more completely vindicated. Bell Germany, had hoped to make a telephone, but he had failed. His machine Dolbear came to view with an opposition telephone. It was not an said, "upon your very great invention, and I hope to see it supplant well enough for nine years or more as a weapon to use against the Bell Professor Amos E. Dolbear, of Tufts College. He, like Gray, had written patents. Poor Philip Reis himself, the son of a baker in Frankfort, was not a telephone at all, in any practical sense, but which served device made by a German named Philip Reis, in 1861. Thus there appeared upon the scene the so-called "Reis telephone," which After Gray, the weightiest challenger who came against Bell was transmit the pitch of a sound, but not the QUALITY. At its best, it disrespect to his memory to say that on some points involved in the could carry a tune, but never at any time a spoken sentence. Reis, in the city of Washington. Said Mr. Maynard: "Mr. Gray was an intimate and valued friend of mine, but it is no obtaining the wealth and honor which is your due." But one year later, was operated by a "make-and-break" current, and so could not carry was the first inventor, and Gray was not." imitation of Bell's, he insisted, but an improvement upon an electrical a letter of applause to Bell in 1877. "I congratulate you, sir," he

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.
I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING